SIZ
7
<4
a B DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Ks DUARL FUR GURRELCTIOUN OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
Sa S
CRS
Docket No: 389
21 September 2011
1
tu
+O
t
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
gions
naval record pursuant to the provi of Title 10 of the United
e ti 52
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 September 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of t
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted we
insufficient to establish the existence of probable
error or injustice.
The Board found that you served in the Navy Reserve from 27
September 2008 to 14 June 2011, when you were discharged by
reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a general discharge.
You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as required by
governing directives.
As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy,
there is no basis for granting your request. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did
not request such consideration and you have not exhausted an
available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval
Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may do so by submitting the
attached DD Form 293 to the NDRB.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ip
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di e
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10413-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02820-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is gn the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07911-10
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the -Mstence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07262-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02950-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when agplying for a correction of an official naval Consequently, record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03017-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted an available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01029-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02727-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ag on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12987-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden +s on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of pyobable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13784-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...